No service of court charge to Sahara Reporters (2nd defendant), on Wednesday, stalled Omoyele Sowore’s proposed arraignment at the Federal High Court, Abuja.

The duo is billed to be arraigned before Justice Emeka Nwite of the federal high court, Abuja on newly filed charges of forgery, defamation, and alleged incitement to mutiny.

At resumed proceedings, the prosecution informed the court that the second defendant (Sahara Reporter) had not been served with the court summons.

The court was told that efforts to serve Sahara Reporter through substituted means, by publishing the summons, had not been successful, as the publication was not ready.

Consequently, the matter is adjourned till September 15, for arraignment.

The prosecution had filed fresh charges against Sowore and Sahara Reporters in relation to a series of reports published on Sahara Reporters about an alleged police promotion scandal and Sowore’s participation in protests by retired police officers demanding pension reforms.

“That you Omoyele Sowore and Sahara Reporters on or about the July 30 2025 within the jurisdiction of this court did conspire between yourselves to commit a felony to wit: forgery, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 1(2)(c) of the Miscellaneous Offences Act Cap M17 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria.

“That you Omoyele Sowore and Sahara Reporters on or about the July 30, within the jurisdiction of this court, forged a police wireless message purported to have been signed by the Principal Staff Officer to the Inspector-General of Police, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 1(2)(c) of the Miscellaneous Offences Act Cap M17 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria.

“That you Omoyele Sowore on or about July 31 within the jurisdiction of this court, did intentionally post a fake police signal and other inciting materials on your Facebook page with the intention to incite members of the force and the general public to embark on a mutiny against the Federal Government and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 114 of the Penal Code Law,” the three-count charge read.

Speaking with journalists after the court session, counsel to Sowore, Mr Marshall Abubakar said that he would be challenging the competence of the charges, describing them as frivolous and unjustified.

He said that there was no basis for his client to enter a plea in a charge that was defective.