More
    HomeNewsTribunal strikes out suit against MultiChoice price hike

    Tribunal strikes out suit against MultiChoice price hike

    Published on

    The Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal (CCPT) in Abuja has dismissed a suit filed by Uche Diala and 961 other DStv and GOtv subscribers against MultiChoice Nigeria and the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC), citing lack of jurisdiction.

    The class action suit had challenged MultiChoice’s subscription price increases in November 2023 and May 2024, on the grounds that the increases were arbitrary, exploitative, and unfair.

    The claimants had sought to reverse the hikes and compel the company to adopt a more flexible billing model, such as a pay-as-you-view system used in other countries like South Africa.

    They also accused MultiChoice of price discrimination against Nigerian consumers.

    However, MultiChoice, through its counsel, raised a preliminary objection, arguing that pricing decisions do not fall within the tribunal’s remit and that the suit was improperly filed as a class action without first seeking the tribunal’s leave.

    In his ruling delivered yesterday, a three-member panel of the tribunal, led by Justice Thomas Okosun, held that the core issues raised, which were pricing and tariff regulation, fall under the exclusive purview of the executive branch, particularly the President, as stipulated under the Price Control Act.

    “The issue of price regulation is a matter that falls within the exclusive purview of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,” Okosun stated.

    While the tribunal acknowledged it holds both original and appellate jurisdiction under the FCCPC Act, it emphasised that such authority does not cover general price control unless abuse of market dominance is established—a point the claimants failed to prove.

    On the procedural matter of filing a class action without prior approval, the tribunal noted that although it is ideal to obtain leave, failure to do so was not fatal in this instance since the claimants demonstrated a shared grievance and common interest.

    Nonetheless, the tribunal upheld MultiChoice’s objection, ruling that it lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter.

    “The preliminary objection of the first defendant succeeds,” the panel held. “This suit is accordingly struck out for want of jurisdiction.”

    The Abuja division of the Federal High Court had, in a similar decision on May 8, upheld MultiChoice’s price increases after the company sued the FCCPC.

    Latest articles

    APC South-South Says Rivers Assembly Impeachment Plot is Retaliation Against Fubara for Rejecting Fictitious Projects in 2026 Budget

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) South-South Group has accused Rivers Assembly lawmakers loyal to...

    NIGER EAST 2027: WHY THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE TO 313

    By Mohammed A. Mohammed In Niger East, a quiet revolution began in 2019 when...

    Energy governance group faults ADC, says Tinubu’s approval of NNPC legacy balance reconciliation restores fiscal transparency, not revenue loss

    The Centre for Energy Governance and Public Finance Accountability (CEGPFA) has dismissed claims by...

     PDP vows to reclaim Lugard house seat of Kogi state government in 2027

    Olu Samuel The Chairman of the Kogi state People's Democratic party, PDP, Hon. Muhammed Sanni...

    More like this

    APC South-South Says Rivers Assembly Impeachment Plot is Retaliation Against Fubara for Rejecting Fictitious Projects in 2026 Budget

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) South-South Group has accused Rivers Assembly lawmakers loyal to...

    NIGER EAST 2027: WHY THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE TO 313

    By Mohammed A. Mohammed In Niger East, a quiet revolution began in 2019 when...

    Energy governance group faults ADC, says Tinubu’s approval of NNPC legacy balance reconciliation restores fiscal transparency, not revenue loss

    The Centre for Energy Governance and Public Finance Accountability (CEGPFA) has dismissed claims by...