By Tom Odi
Politicians are very good talkers. At times, they can’t keep a civil tongue. Yet, at times, they speak
with forked tongue. But, that some Nigerian politicians finesse politics with luxuriant language and
peculiar argots is a known fact. You can take that to the bank. Many of them have rich vocabulary and
robust diction laced with literary coinages. Some of the expressions are plain jibes and jokes that make
you roll in the aisles.
In the 50s or the First Republic, the word “penkelemesi” was historically linked to Adegoke Adelabu
who had reportedly described the imbroglio in the then Western Regional Assembly as “peculiar mess”,
yorubanized into “penkelemesi”.
The phrase: “If you Tarka me, I will Daboh you” emanated from
OF POLITICAL EXPRESSIONS: BETWEEN EMOTIONS AND STRATEGIES.
By Tom Odi
Politicians are very good talkers. At times, they can’t keep a civil tongue. Yet, at times, they speak
with forked tongue. But, that some Nigerian politicians finesse politics with luxuriant language and
peculiar argots is a known fact. You can take that to the bank. Many of them have rich vocabulary and
robust diction laced with literary coinages. Some of the expressions are plain jibes and jokes that make
you roll in the aisles.
In the 50s or the First Republic, the word “penkelemesi” was historically linked to Adegoke Adelabu
who had reportedly described the imbroglio in the then Western Regional Assembly as “peculiar mess”,
yorubanized into “penkelemesi”.
The phrase: “If you Tarka me, I will Daboh you” emanated from the political competition between
two Benue State politicians, Joseph Tarka and Godwin Daboh. Nor can we easily forget the hilarious
expression: “When the come comes to become”, reportedly attributed to Kingsley Mbadiwe.
In the Third Republic, the National Republican Convention (NRC) with its party symbol as the eagle
had the lingo as ” The Eagle has landed”. In the language craft exhibited in the Fourth Republic,
politicians in the PDP sloganeered the expression, “PDP, power to the people”.
In recent times are the expressions, “Elections are not won in the social media” and “Elections are not
won by emotions but by strategies”. This last expression which has crept into the political lexicon of
Nigeria, engages the attention of this writer.
Elections provide the fertile turf for the flexing of political muscles where each contestant spins their
own masterstroke to clinch victory. In this period when there must be a pick from the pack, when a
victor must emerge, emotions are typically high.t The whole political space is swarmed with a melange of
campaign banners and mementoes conveying sentiments. These are usually partisan, religious and
ethnic sentiments.
Of the emotions canvassed to push for advantage is ethnicity. In a pluralist country as ours, every
tribe wants to take its turn to occupy key positions. This strident clamour for ethnic consideration, often
in the desire for a fellow tribesman to be at the helms, pans out in the belief that fellow ethnic brothers
will have robust opportunities if their own tribesman is the leader.
Majority tribes do not want to cede power on the lame excuse that hypes the threadbare refrain,
“Democracy is a game of numbers”. Minority tribes believe that the polity belongs to all and every
stakeholder must be advantaged by collective ownership. This same sentiment goes for religious issue
apart from partisanship where each registered political party rigorously presses to drub the other. So
then, the political space becomes one hot-house milieu and a bedlam of ear-splitting agitations.
In the course of this hoopla for equitable power rotation formula, the moral import of brotherhood
is, however, submerged by both hardball and bully-boy tactics. Herein comes the argument that
strategies win elections not emotions. While the muslim-muslim ticket of the APC in the last presidential
election mortified and flattened the Nigerian Christendom, Tinubu vociferously championed strategy as
his reason for his choice of Shettima, his fellow muslim, as his running mate barring other considerations
that will calcify contest into conquest and flower it into victory.
Scaled down to Kogi State where the governorship election comes up in November 11 this year, the
three main ethnic stocks in the state have donned the garbs of ethnicity as the candidates of the three
main political parties: the APC, PDP and SDP display tribal badges. APC has Usman Ododo from Ebira;
PDP, Dino Melaye from the Okun axis and Muritala Ajaka of the SDP from Igala.
The principle of rotation, uncodified constitutionally and hinged on gentleman agreement to
accommodate divergent aspirations, hopes and dreams, seems to be swept under the carpet. While the
Igalas, who have ruled the state for 16 years and often hype majority emotion, believe that power must
return to them, the Okuns aver that their Western axis has never had a bite at the leadership cherry of
the state. They believe that equity and justice must be the tectonic plate upon which the axis stands to
agitate for the governorship position.
However, the Ebiras, who have been in power in the last eight years, seem to have gone beyond
sentiments. They premise their foray into the forthcoming governorship contest on pure strategy. In
other words, everyone can throw their hat into the ring and strategize to win. So, then, the best and
most astute strategist should coast to victory.
In summary, ours is one torridly tempestuous political space where political expressions, dressed in
deafening refrains, grapple to enact peculiar messages…some frivolous and ridiculous yet, some critical,
real and sublime. Which claim will seal the deal, time will tell.
the political competition between
two Benue State politicians, Joseph Tarka and Godwin Daboh. Nor can we easily forget the hilarious
expression: “When the come comes to become”, reportedly attributed to Kingsley Mbadiwe.
In the Third Republic, the National Republican Convention (NRC) with its party symbol as the eagle
had the lingo as ” The Eagle has landed”. In the language craft exhibited in the Fourth Republic,
politicians in the PDP sloganeered the expression, “PDP, power to the people”.
In recent times are the expressions, “Elections are not won in the social media” and “Elections are not
won by emotions but by strategies”. This last expression which has crept into the political lexicon of
Nigeria, engages the attention of this writer.
Elections provide the fertile turf for the flexing of political muscles where each contestant spins their
own masterstroke to clinch victory. In this period when there must be a pick from the pack, when a
victor must emerge, emotions are typically high. The whole political space is swarmed with a melange of
campaign banners and mementoes conveying sentiments. These are usually partisan, religious and
ethnic sentiments.
Of the emotions canvassed to push for advantage is ethnicity. In a pluralist country as ours, every
tribe wants to take its turn to occupy key positions. This strident clamour for ethnic consideration, often
in the desire for a fellow tribesman to be at the helms, pans out in the belief that fellow ethnic brothers
will have robust opportunities if their own tribesman is the leader.
Majority tribes do not want to cede power on the lame excuse that hypes the threadbare refrain,
“Democracy is a game of numbers”. Minority tribes believe that the polity belongs to all and every
stakeholder must be advantaged by collective ownership. This same sentiment goes for religious issue
apart from partisanship where each registered political party rigorously presses to drub the other. So
then, the political space becomes one hot-house milieu and a bedlam of ear-splitting agitations.
In the course of this hoopla for equitable power rotation formula, the moral import of brotherhood
is, however, submerged by both hardball and bully-boy tactics. Herein comes the argument that
strategies win elections not emotions. While the muslim-muslim ticket of the APC in the last presidential
election mortified and flattened the Nigerian Christendom, Tinubu vociferously championed strategy as
his reason for his choice of Shettima, his fellow muslim, as his running mate barring other considerations
that will calcify contest into conquest and flower it into victory.
Scaled down to Kogi State where the governorship election comes up in November 11 this year, the
three main ethnic stocks in the state have donned the garbs of ethnicity as the candidates of the three
main political parties: the APC, PDP and SDP display tribal badges. APC has Usman Ododo from Ebira;
PDP, Dino Melaye from the Okun axis and Muritala Ajaka of the SDP from Igala.
The principle of rotation, uncodified constitutionally and hinged on gentleman agreement to
accommodate divergent aspirations, hopes and dreams, seems to be swept under the carpet. While the
Igalas, who have ruled the state for 16 years and often hype majority emotion, believe that power must
return to them, the Okuns aver that their Western axis has never had a bite at the leadership cherry of
the state. They believe that equity and justice must be the tectonic plate upon which the axis stands to
agitate for the governorship position.
However, the Ebiras, who have been in power in the last eight years, seem to have gone beyond
sentiments. They premise their foray into the forthcoming governorship contest on pure strategy. In
other words, everyone can throw their hat into the ring and strategize to win. So, then, the best and
most astute strategist should coast to victory.
In summary, ours is one torridly tempestuous political space where political expressions, dressed in
deafening refrains, grapple to enact peculiar messages…some frivolous and ridiculous yet, some critical,
real and sublime. Which claim will seal the deal, time will tell.