By Milcah Tanimu
In a significant development, Inspector General of Police Kayode Egbetokun has ordered the withdrawal of approximately 40 policemen who were providing security and investigative assistance to the Kano State Public Complaints and Anti-Corruption Commission. This decision comes amidst ongoing investigations into allegations of multi-billion naira corruption against Abdullahi Ganduje, the national chairman of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).
Reportedly, the directive for the withdrawal of these officers was issued to the Kano State Commissioner of Police, Usaini Gumel, on Thursday. A text message sent to the affected policemen instructed them to report back to the Command headquarters immediately, with those handling high-profile cases directed to hand over their responsibilities promptly.
Sources reveal that some of these policemen were aiding the commission’s anti-corruption investigations, providing security for its headquarters, and safeguarding other properties seized during investigations. This move has left the commission vulnerable, raising concerns about its ability to carry out its duties effectively.
The withdrawal of police support has sparked criticism, with some questioning the timing and motives behind the decision. There are allegations of preferential treatment, as security around Ganduje has reportedly been strengthened while support for the anti-corruption commission has been withdrawn. This disparity has led to accusations of interference and undermined confidence in the impartiality of law enforcement.
Despite attempts to seek clarification from the Force Public Relations Officer, Muyiwa Adejobi, no response has been received as of the time of filing this report.
Meanwhile, Ganduje, along with his wife, son, and five others, faces serious charges related to corruption, misappropriation, and diversion of funds amounting to billions of naira. These charges include allegations of soliciting and receiving bribes in connection with government contracts, as outlined in the charge sheet.
The situation underscores the challenges faced by anti-corruption agencies in carrying out their mandate, particularly when confronted with high-profile cases involving influential figures. It also raises broader questions about the independence of law enforcement and the integrity of the justice system in combating corruption effectively.