By Milcah Tanimu

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s swift start in office was necessitated by a series of pressing problems. One of his strengths has been his ability to identify talent and put it to good use. However, his recent delay in forming his cabinet and the composition of the resulting lists have sparked disappointment and criticism.

Tinubu’s reputation for spotting and utilizing talent was a key campaign point, given his successful governance of Lagos for eight years. However, his delay of 60 days in forming his cabinet, followed by the release of lists that are deemed appeasing to the “old guard,” has raised concerns. While there are some capable professionals on the lists, the presence of nine former governors and individuals who previously held ministerial positions suggests that his talent-spotting prowess may have been compromised.

The question arises: Has the power dynamics in Abuja negatively impacted Tinubu’s decision-making? Or is there an inner circle influencing his choices? The situation is nuanced, with parallels to over two decades ago when former President Olusegun Obasanjo faced similar challenges.

Obasanjo’s initial ministerial choices were critiqued, yet his later selections are now applauded. His first term was marked by an assortment of politicians and military figures, some with questionable reputations. However, Obasanjo navigated his way, reorganizing his cabinet within months and achieving a more cohesive team by his second term.

The current situation may echo Obasanjo’s experience. Tinubu’s governance of Lagos differs significantly from the complexities of running the entire nation. While some of his cabinet selections have raised eyebrows, they might serve a purpose in a transitional period. The real test lies in how he manages his team and navigates the dynamics of governance.

Tinubu must remember that he alone bears the responsibility for his presidency’s success or failure. While he has taken tough decisions, the legacy he leaves will depend on his ability to lead his team and tackle the challenges ahead. It’s essential to move beyond the focus on Abuja and turn attention to the states, where governance issues mirror those at the national level.