By Milcah Tanimu

The National Assembly has stepped into the debate over the Federal Government’s proposed age limit of 18 years for students to sit for the West African Senior Secondary School Certificate Examination (WASSCE). The move follows widespread criticism of the policy, introduced by Minister of Education Professor Tahir Mamman, which has been condemned by various political figures and civil society organizations.

Senate’s Response
Senator Yemi Adaramodu, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, confirmed that the Senate plans to hold a public hearing on the matter. He stated, “The Senate will consider any government policy through its relevant committees and public hearings before giving it constitutional and statutory approval.”

House of Representatives’ Position
House of Representatives spokesman Akin Rotimi indicated that the Green Chamber has not yet formed an opinion on the policy as members have not been briefed on the issue.

Criticisms and Reactions
Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar labeled the policy as “archaic” and a “barrier to academic freedom,” arguing that it contradicts Nigeria’s federal system and educational goals. He criticized the government for not considering exceptions for exceptionally gifted students and for not aligning with global educational standards.

Yinka Ogunde, founder of the Concerned Parents and Educators Network (CPE), argued that such a sudden policy implementation without adequate consultation is unrealistic and reminiscent of a military regime. She called for consultations and a more structured approach starting from primary education.

Global Rights Nigeria’s Abiodun Baiyewu also opposed the policy, noting that it could exacerbate the problem of out-of-school children and might drive parents to seek education abroad, thus leading to capital flight.

The Education Rights Campaign (ERC) demanded an immediate suspension of the policy, criticizing the abrupt enforcement and lack of stakeholder engagement. They called for a summit to discuss the policy’s implications and its relevance to current educational realities.

*Additional Critiques*
Dr. Stella Aririguzuh, a university lecturer, warned that the policy could lead to increased capital flight as parents might send their children abroad for education. She acknowledged that while the policy might lead to more mature students, it could also stifle younger students’ academic ambitions.

The Resource Centre for Human Rights and Civic Education (CHRICED) and Arewa Youth Assembly also criticized the policy. Dr. Zikirullahi Ibrahim of CHRICED argued that it violates constitutional provisions and may lead to falsification of documents. Mohammed Danlami of Arewa Youth Assembly highlighted concerns about the policy’s impact on gifted students and the overall educational system.

The National Assembly’s involvement suggests a legislative process will address the policy’s concerns, with public hearings and consultations expected to shape the final decision. The controversy underscores the need for a balanced approach to educational reforms that considers diverse student needs and global best practices.